When George Harrison and Ravi Shankar assembled friends like Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr, and Eric Clapton for the Concert for Bangladesh at Madison Square Garden in 1971, they were responding to images of war and famine that most Western audiences were only beginning to grasp. The twin shows raised money for refugees from the Bangladesh Liberation War and the Bhola cyclone, and they pioneered the template for the arena‑sized charity spectacular, long before Live Aid. Half a century later, as benefit concerts have become a familiar format, what remains of that night’s radical promise, and what do we risk forgetting in the glimmer of such nights?
A few months ago, Brian Eno gathered some of the biggest names in contemporary music, Gorillaz among them, for a benefit concert for Gaza. Before that, there was Live Aid in 1985, Freddie Mercury commanding one of the greatest crowd performances in rock history. Before that there was 'We Are the World'. Each of these moments carried the conviction that music could move people toward conscience. These efforts started with a single afternoon and evening in New York City, more than fifty years ago.
On August 1, 1971, Madison Square Garden hosted something the world had not quite seen before. George Harrison of The Beatles and Pandit Ravi Shankar organised two concerts that day to raise awareness and funds for the refugees of Bangladesh, then caught between a genocidal military campaign by Pakistan and the devastation left by the 1970 Bhola cyclone. The performers gathered included rock legends like Eric Clapton, Bob Dylan, Billy Preston, Ringo Starr, Alla Rakha, and Shankar, alongside Ali Akbar Khan, both of whom had ancestral roots in Bangladesh.
The concert raised awareness, funds, and redefined what popular music could do in the face of human suffering. As historian Gary Tillery observed, because people were fascinated with rock stars, the masses became educated about geopolitical events they had been entirely unaware of before. Among those revelations, the United States was actively supplying weapons and financial aid to the Pakistani army under General Yahya Khan, who conducted the atrocities.
Getting there was not easy. Harrison faced extraordinary resistance from the recording industry over performance rights. Millions of dollars raised from the subsequent album and film were locked with the IRS for years. By 1985, roughly $12 million had finally reached Bangladesh, and it continues to raise money. Ravi Shankar later said, "In one day, the whole world knew the name of Bangladesh."
In the original concert's filmed introduction, Ravi Shankar stated plainly, "We are not trying to do any politics." Politics, however, has a way of finding you regardless. The moment Harrison took the stage to draw attention to a crisis that American foreign policy was actively enabling, the act became political whether the artists intended it or not.
This raises a harder question about the benefit concert tradition as a whole. The working-class people in Western audiences who bought tickets and records were, in most cases, genuinely moved and genuinely generous. Many were unaware that a significant portion of their relative comfort exists within a global economic system that has historically extracted enormous wealth from countries like Bangladesh, first through direct colonial rule, and today through trade structures, debt arrangements, and labour conditions that continue to concentrate profit in wealthy nations.
Charity works as a pressure valve, a temporary band-aid. This is not, of course, an argument against charity. The $12 million mattered; the awareness it raised mattered enormously. The problem might be when charity becomes the ceiling of our response rather than the floor.
Some artists have pushed further, like Bob Vylan, the UK punk-rap duo at Glastonbury in 2025. The press and political establishment attacked them for it. The likes of Rage Against the Machine and Tom Morello have spent decades naming the structures that produce the crises that benefit concerts then respond to. These artists face a different and harsher reception than those who raise money.
The Concert for Bangladesh gave the world a template for compassion expressed through music. It educated millions, embarrassed a complicit superpower. Its limitations were structural and built into the form itself — with Western stars at the centre, Bangladeshi people as the recipients of concern rather than the agents of their own liberation, funds routed through international bureaucracies, and the politics softened into humanitarian feeling.
Charity teaches us that suffering is real and that we are connected across borders. The next step, the one the concert tradition has rarely dared to take, is understanding why the suffering keeps arriving, and doing something about that too.
If you enjoyed reading this, here’s more from Homegrown:
Why Is A High School In Hungary Named After Dr Ambedkar?
Sandeep Menon’s ‘Sacred Grounds’ Maps The Beautiful Game's Political & Social Influence
Blood In The Open Skies: The Murder That Grounded India’s First Private Airline