Gone Native: How The Trout Became A Symbol Of British Colonialism In The Himalayas

When you stand by a Himalayan river in Kashmir or Himachal today, the quicksilver flash of a trout leaping against the current feels almost timeless, as if the fish has always belonged to these cold mountain waters. But the trout are not, in fact, native to the Himalayas. The trout is a colonial import, introduced to the region by the British in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Today, the species’ presence in the Himalayas is what remains of the erstwhile Raj — a lingering history of ecological transplantation, cultural projection, and unintended consequences.

As the Indian subcontinent came under British rule, the colonial officers tasked with maintaining the growing empire sought to make India’s hills resemble the familiar landscapes of England and Scotland. From Shimla to Ooty, they built hill stations where the climate, architecture, and manicured gardens conjured the feeling of a familiar homeland. The rivers, however, lacked the fish of their memories.

For colonial officials, angling and fly-fishing were not only a pastime but a marker of class and colonial power, an assertion of control over both nature and time. But native fish such as the mahseer, a large Asian carp, revered locally as a “tiger of the rivers”, were considered unsuitable for such an undertaking — they were often too powerful, unpredictable, and alien to the genteel Englishmen. The solution was to import European fish, especially salmon and trout.

The first serious attempt to introduce trout to India came in 1863, when Dr Francis Day, a British Army surgeon and hobbyist naturalist, tried to introduce salmon and trout in the Nilgiris. The experiment failed. Decades later, Frank James Mitchell, an officer of Scottish origin, arranged for brown trout ova from Scotland to be shipped to the Kashmir valley. In the 1890s, the first hatching succeeded in Kashmir, and by the early 1900s, the Jhelum and its tributaries were alive with trout. Mitchell also set up a fruit farm and launched a little-known processed food brand called Kissan in the valley, making jams, jellies, and preserves.

The trout’s journey from the British island to the Indian subcontinent was part of a wider imperial arc: to domesticate and familiarise unfamiliar landscapes by introducing British flora and fauna. Across the world, the British Empire relocated many plants and animals — like water hyacinths in Asia, rabbits in Australia, sparrows in North America, and acacias in Africa — to shape landscapes in their own image.

The arrival of trout also unsettled Himalayan food cultures. For centuries, rivers were populated with native fish that sustained local diets. When British officials reserved stretches of water for angling and fly-fishing, locals in Kashmir and Himachal found themselves excluded from traditional fishing grounds. After independence, however, state hatcheries and tourism reshaped the trout economy. The fish shifted from being a colonial delicacy to a marketable dish in local dhabas and homestays. Today, fried or curried trout is celebrated as a staple in regional cuisine, but its presence reflects a history of dispossession and adaptation — an imported taste grafted onto indigenous kitchens.

Across continents, these interventions reveal a familiar pattern: colonial interventions in ecology were rarely driven by necessity or conservation effort, and often motivated by aesthetics, control, convenience, or simply a desire to project colonial power. In the Himalayas, the trout satisfied the nostalgic cravings of homesick British sahibs, forever changing the river ecology and regional food culture in Kashmir and Himachal. At the same time, in the rest of Asia, water hyacinths disrupted local economies dependent on fishing and transportation.

Each of these colonial imports reflected the imperial desire to reshape the unfamiliar according to colonial preferences, with little regard for local ecological balance. Today, they are what remains of the Empire. The sun may have set on the British Empire, but its lasting impacts are embedded in the rivers, mountains, and forests of once-colonised lands.

If you enjoyed reading this, here’s more from Homegrown:

From Bengal To Gaza, Famine Has Always Been The Weapon Of Choice For Colonial Powers

The Indigo Revolt: When Colonial-Era Bengali Farmers Rebelled Against The British Raj

A Glorified Cartel: How India Fuelled & Funded Queen Victoria's Empire Of Opium