- HOMEGROWN WORLD
- HGCREATORS
- HGEXPLORE
- HGVOICES
- HGSHOP
- CAREERS
- ABOUT US
- CONTACT US
Goodness Gracious Me endures not just as a milestone for South Asian representation, but because its creators dared to let their characters be flawed, absurd, and brilliantly funny without ever turning them into cautionary tales.
By the time Goodness Gracious Me arrived on BBC Two in 1998, British television had already developed a fairly tired vocabulary for Indians. There were strict mothers, thick accents, family businesses, arranged marriages and the occasional curry joke, all filtered through the people deciding what an Indian family was supposed to look and sound like on television. 'Goodness Gracious Me', created by Sanjeev Bhaskar, Meera Syal and Anil Gupta and performed by Bhaskar, Syal, Kulvinder Ghir and Nina Wadia, had considerably more material to work with. The series began on BBC Radio 4 in 1996 and brought British-Asian families, friendships, aspirations, embarrassments and assorted cultural nonsense into mainstream British comedy, with the same performers becoming different characters from one sketch to the next.
The first couple of sketches did very little for me. I was comparing them with the comic language I consume now, which probably says more about my own impatience than it does about a show made almost thirty years before I watched it. Once I got a handle on the rhythm, the irony and the sheer commitment of these people to whatever ridiculous premise they had been handed, the comedy started opening up. A lot of the pleasure is in recognising the behaviour underneath the joke: the parent who is determined to impress somebody, the child who is mortified by the parent, the person who has decided they have discovered the secret to becoming properly British, the person who is absolutely convinced that everything worth knowing was invented in India. There is enough room for these characters to become idiots before the sketch moves on, and that turns out to be very useful for comedy sketches.
That freedom matters because Goodness Gracious Me was being made by British South Asians at a time when South Asian representation on mainstream British television was still largely being shaped by people outside the community. The distinction between appearing on television and having creative control over how you appear on television is enormous, and the show used that instinctively. Its characters did not have to behave like respectable representatives of Indian culture. They could be petty, vain, embarrassing, conservative, delusional, or completely insufferable, and the writers could make those qualities funny because they were writing from within the world rather than explaining it from the outside. Meera Syal has spoken about the pleasure of working with people who caught the tiny domestic references without needing them explained, down to things as mundane as plastic-covered sofas and drawers full of Tupperware. That shared vocabulary is all over the show and is also what makes it enjoyable.
The Kapoor family, or the "Coopers" as they insist on being called, are probably the clearest example. Their barbecue turns into a competition over who has managed to become the most convincingly English, with the Rabindranaths presenting themselves as the Robinsons and everybody monitoring everybody else's pronunciation, manners, and behaviour. The Coopers’ son has inconveniently returned from backpacking in India with an enthusiasm for his own heritage, which his parents regard with the horror of people who have spent years trying to convince themselves that their surname has always been Cooper. The sketch is funny because nobody involved can see how ridiculous the performance (of being British) has become. They are so invested in proving their association with the world around them that the performance itself becomes the thing worth laughing at.
What I like about this is that the show does not leave Indian culture sitting in the position of “the funny foreign thing”. It keeps moving the joke around. In “Going for an English”, Indian characters go out for an English meal and behave towards the waiter with the same misplaced confidence and cultural superiority that British diners have brought to Indian restaurants for decades: they mispronounce his name, ask for the blandest thing on the menu and order an absurd quantity of chips. The sketch was even voted sixth in Channel 4's list of the greatest comedy sketches. It works because the cultural gaze has been handed to the people who usually have to endure it. Because now, English food, English manners and English social habits are available for scrutiny, and the Indian characters get to be the annoying and touristy ones for once.
There’s also Mr “Everything Comes From India”, who may be the show's most gloriously unreasonable character. His argument is essentially that the entire world is one large Indian cultural appropriation scandal waiting to be uncovered. Jesus was Indian because he worked for his father and fed 5,000 people with very little; Superman is Indian because he has two jobs, a bad haircut, and can apparently run faster than a train; Leonardo da Vinci becomes Leonardo from Faridabad. The joke starts with genuine Indian contributions to the world and then keeps extending the logic until it becomes completely indefensible, which is precisely why it works. Meera Syal has described the character as a way of reclaiming India's place in world history before the British turned that history into something else, and the sketch manages to make that idea both recognisable and extremely entertaining.
That character also stops the show from becoming a simple exercise in making white Britain look stupid. Goodness Gracious Me is just as willing to make Indians look absurd, and some of its funniest material comes from watching South Asian characters take their own assumptions to absurd lengths. The competitive mothers arguing over their sons, the woman who insists she can make absolutely everything at home for nothing, the teenage Bhangra Muffins trying to sound cool while speaking in the language their parents taught them — these characters are funny because the writers know the social worlds they are parodying well enough to notice the comical details.
That is also why the show could get away with being so unhelpful to the idea of respectable representation. One of its sketches has a gay Indian man bring home his white partner, only for his mother to wonder why he could not have found a “nice Indian boy”. The joke is uncomfortable in a useful way because the community that has been dealing with racism and assimilation is also capable of reproducing its own prejudices. There is no tidy moral hierarchy where one group gets to be enlightened and another gets to be inane, everybody gets their turn.
Watching Goodness Gracious Me now, some of its references and attitudes inevitably belong to the period in which it was made, but the basic comic instinct has held up remarkably well. It came from a television culture that allowed sketches to develop a premise for several minutes and performers to build characters rather than chase a punchline before the viewer scrolls away. That format gives the writing time to become more culturally specific, which is useful when the joke depends on recognising why somebody would be horrified by their surname being pronounced correctly. The show is a product of its time, but it doesn’t only survive out of its significance, it survives because the people making it were funny enough to see their own communities — their own neighbours, and the people who thought they were perfectly normal — as fair game.
That is probably the most valuable thing the show left behind. South Asian representation on British television mattered tremendously, but the real pleasure of watching the show is seeing South Asian characters lampooned without the joke turning into a prejudiced judgement on the community itself. The characters were moronic without becoming cautionary tales, culturally specific without becoming educational material, and completely wrong without dragging an entire community down with them. They just get to be funny people. For a comedy show, I believe that that should be a fairly obvious requirement, but for British television in 1998, it was a much bigger deal.
