India At The Venice Biennale 2026: What Does It Mean To Be Home?

Seven years is a long time in the world of contemporary art. When India last participated in La Biennale Di Venezia — the Venice Biennale — in 2019, the art world was a different place altogether. As India returns to the Biennale this year with ‘Geographies of Distance: Remembering Home’, it does so into a world, and consequently an art world, fundamentally altered by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the ongoing devastation in Gaza, and the escalating conflict across West Asia and its worldwide impact. What does it mean to remember home in such a world?

The India pavilion, curated by Dr Amin Jaffer and presented through an elaborate public-private partnership between the Ministry of Culture, the Nita Mukesh Ambani Cultural Centre, and Serendipity Arts, brings together five artists — Alwar Balasubramaniam (Bala), Sumakshi Singh, Ranjani Shettar, Skarma Sonam Tashi, and Asim Waqif — from across India. Installed in the 14th-century Isolotto warehouse at the Arsenale, the exhibition responds to the Biennale’s overarching theme, ‘In Minor Keys’, with restrained, formalistic bodies of work that resist the Biennale’s usual spectacle of screens, immersive projections, and algorithmic hyperreality in favour of tactile intimacy.

Jaffer’s curatorial framework situates the idea of ‘home’ within the material conditions of contemporary India — of urban redevelopment, internal migration, diasporic dispersal, and ecological instability. But instead of offering monumental symbols of nationhood, the exhibition turns to unstable materials — such as earth, thread, bamboo, and papier-mâché — to examine what remains when physical and emotional landscapes collapse under the weight of national mythologies.

The five distinctive bodies of work on display at the pavilion share a grammar of fragility without a shared vocabulary. Alwar Balasubramaniam’s large-scale soil panels — ‘Drift’ and ‘Not Just for Us’ — sit on the Isolotto floor like excavated landscapes, their surfaces cross-hatched with fissures formed over months of drying in his rural Tamil Nadu studio. Peacocks, monkeys, and snakes crossed the clay surface as it dried, leaving impressions that the artist preserved. The earth, he says, recorded everything.

Sumakshi Singh’s ‘Permanent Address’, made with life-sized panels of embroidered thread — a silk, cotton, and nylon stretched on steel frames and spread over twelve metres — reconstructs her demolished family home in Delhi as a series of translucent membranes. Grilles, doorframes, and decorative facades, rendered in white thread finer than hair, are suspended so that visitors can move through these ghost rooms that offer no shelter. Their only purpose is to exist as an architectural apparition of a home lost twice over: first during Partition, and again during the demolition of the new home Sigh’s grandparents rebuilt in New Delhi.

Ranjani Shettar’s ‘Under the Same Sky’, consisting of dozens of floral sculptural elements in handwoven cotton and lacquer, is suspended from the ceiling in a slowly unfurling composition she describes as an orchestra. On the mezzanine, Skarma Sonam Tashi’s ‘Echoes of Home’ is a miniature of a Ladakhi settlement rendered in papier-mâché and clay — a meditation on belonging, distance, and the sustainability of traditional ways of living in a rapidly changing world. Asim Waqif’s ‘Chaal’, a large-scale bamboo structure that stands out as the pavilion’s largest artefact, stands amidst all of it like an altarpiece.

The Venice Biennale has long served as a theatre of national self-mythologies. The Biennale’s national pavilion model embodies the many contradictions of the modern nation — above all, the idea of the nation as a coherent cultural entity — while contemporary art increasingly destabilises fixed identities. India’s 2026 pavilion inhabits this dichotomy with unusual clarity. While official statements frame the exhibition as an articulation of India’s civilizational ethos and cultural resurgence on the global stage, the works themselves are more diverse, more ambiguous, and more attentive to fracture, disappearance, and impermanence than ever.

This tension mirrors what cultural theorist Homi K. Bhabha once described as the ‘nation narration’ problem: the nation is never a stable concept but something continuously produced through competing stories, memories, and performances. The India Pavilion becomes precisely such a contested narrative space. On one hand, it participates in the contemporary state project of cultural diplomacy, which we might call “soft power”. On the other — the artists foreground vulnerability over triumphalism.

‘Geographies of Distance: Remembering Home’ resists any singular or fixed idea of India. The works speak to lives shaped by migration within India and across the diaspora, where home often survives less as a physical place than as an accumulation of gestures, textures, sounds, habits, and inherited rituals carried across generations and geographies. The exhibition suggests that Indian identity is not rooted solely in territory or permanence, but in the capacity to sustain continuity amid constant change. Instead of attempting to define ‘Indianness’, the pavilion creates a space where identity is felt sensorially and emotionally through material, through labor, and through the persistent human desire to find and remember a place to call home, even when home exists only in memory.

Learn more about India in Venice here.

If you enjoyed reading this, here’s more from Homegrown:

Divya Balivada Works With Abstraction To Examine Trauma, Gender, & Inherited Patterns

Rathin Barman’s Kolkata Exhibition Revisits The Unresolved Grief Of Bengal’s Partition

Subodh Gupta’s ‘A Fistful Of Sky’ Is A Monumental Meditation On Migration & Belonging